# AgenticSeek vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AgenticSeek | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 27 560 ✓ | 20 539 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +303 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 70/100 for AgenticSeek, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AgenticSeek.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; AgenticSeek needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AgenticSeek](https://selfhost.directory/project/agenticseek) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/agenticseek.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/agenticseek-vs-mediamtx