Kerberos AgentvsShinobi
Two self-hosted Video Surveillance projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kerberos Agent | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 129 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.13.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 56/100 for Kerberos Agent, so it is the safer default.
Kerberos Agent ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, Kerberos Agent is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
Kerberos Agent details →Shinobi details →All Video Surveillance projects →