# Kerberos Agent vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted [Video Surveillance projects](https://selfhost.directory/video-surveillance), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kerberos Agent | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 129 | 4 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.13.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 56/100 for Kerberos Agent, so it is the safer default.

Kerberos Agent ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Kerberos Agent needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kerberos Agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/agent.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/agent-vs-motioneye