# Afilmory vs ChronoFrame

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Afilmory | ChronoFrame |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #8 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 662 ✓ | 1 964 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +32 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 53/100 for Afilmory, so it is the safer default.

ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Afilmory.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Afilmory needs more configuration.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Afilmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/afilmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/afilmory.md)
- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/afilmory-vs-chronoframe