# aeterna vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | aeterna | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 38 in Personal Productivity | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 306 | 45 002 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.5.5 · 6 Sept 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for aeterna, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for aeterna.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [aeterna](https://selfhost.directory/project/aeterna) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/aeterna.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/aeterna-vs-reactive-resume