# Aerokube Moon vs CloakBrowser

> Two self-hosted [Browser Automation projects](https://selfhost.directory/browser-automation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Aerokube Moon | CloakBrowser |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 281 | 32 559 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +201 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.8.2 · 29 Sept 2026 | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Aerokube Moon, so it is the safer default.

CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Aerokube Moon.

If you want the quickest setup, CloakBrowser is easier to run; Aerokube Moon needs more configuration.

CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+201 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Aerokube Moon](https://selfhost.directory/project/aerokube-moon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/aerokube-moon.md)
- [CloakBrowser](https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cloakbrowser.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/aerokube-moon-vs-cloakbrowser