Aerokube MoonvsCloakBrowser
Two self-hosted Browser Automation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Aerokube Moon | CloakBrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 281 | 32 557 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.8.2 · 29 Sept 2026 | chromium-v155.0.8059.39.2-pro · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Python |
Which one should you pick?
CloakBrowser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Aerokube Moon, so it is the safer default.
CloakBrowser ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Aerokube Moon.
If you want the quickest setup, CloakBrowser is easier to run; Aerokube Moon needs more configuration.
CloakBrowser is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).
Aerokube Moon details →CloakBrowser details →All Browser Automation projects →
Swap a project
Keep Aerokube Moon, compare it with
Keep CloakBrowser, compare it with