AdGuard HomevsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 37 829 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +770 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, AdGuard Home is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+770 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with