AdGuard HomevsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 37 849 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +790 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, AdGuard Home is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+790 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with