# AdGuard Home vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AdGuard Home | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 37 821 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +762 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; AdGuard Home needs more configuration.

AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+762 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AdGuard Home](https://selfhost.directory/project/adguard-home) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/adguard-home.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/adguard-home-vs-qm-music