# AdGuard Home vs d2c.sh

> Two self-hosted [DNS projects](https://selfhost.directory/dns), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AdGuard Home | d2c.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #31 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 37 803 ✓ | 228 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +759 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 41/100 for d2c.sh, so it is the safer default.

AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for d2c.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, d2c.sh is easier to run; AdGuard Home needs more configuration.

AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+759 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AdGuard Home](https://selfhost.directory/project/adguard-home) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/adguard-home.md)
- [d2c.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/adguard-home-vs-d2c-sh