ActualvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 29 833 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +718 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Actual scores 81/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Actual ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Actual is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Actual is growing faster right now (+718 stars in 30 days).
Actual details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with