ActualvsTradeSight
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | TradeSight | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #8 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 29 830 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +715 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 14 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Actual scores 81/100 against 42/100 for TradeSight, so it is the safer default.
Actual ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for TradeSight.
If you want the quickest setup, Actual is easier to run; TradeSight needs more configuration.
Actual is growing faster right now (+715 stars in 30 days).
Actual details →TradeSight details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep TradeSight, compare it with