ActualvsHyperSwitch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | HyperSwitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #2 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 29 832 | 45 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +717 | +1 680 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 2 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Actual and HyperSwitch score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Actual ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, Actual is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 680 stars in 30 days).
Actual details →HyperSwitch details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with