# ActivityWatch vs WordPress

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ActivityWatch | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #2 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 418 | 21 508 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 ✓ | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

WordPress scores 81/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.

ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WordPress.

If you want the quickest setup, WordPress is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.

ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ActivityWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch.md)
- [WordPress](https://selfhost.directory/project/wordpress) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wordpress.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activitywatch-vs-wordpress