# ActivityWatch vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ActivityWatch | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 19 428 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +452 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, ActivityWatch is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+452 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ActivityWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activitywatch-vs-windows-arm