# ActivityWatch vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ActivityWatch | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 19 421 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v2.18.30 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.

ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ActivityWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activitywatch-vs-wbo