# ActivityWatch vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ActivityWatch | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 428 ✓ | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +452 ✓ | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 76/100 for verdaccio, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; ActivityWatch needs more configuration.

ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+452 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ActivityWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activitywatch.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activitywatch-vs-verdaccio