# active_workflow vs AutoGPT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | active_workflow | AutoGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #6 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 863 | 187 807 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +291 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 44/100 for active_workflow, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, active_workflow is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [active_workflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/activeworkflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activeworkflow.md)
- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activeworkflow-vs-autogpt