# Activepieces vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-zookeeper