Activepiecesvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with