ActivepiecesvsYarrtube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Yarrtube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 267 | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Yarrtube details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Yarrtube, compare it with