Activepiecesvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 3 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →wraft details →