# Activepieces vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-windows-arm