# Activepieces vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Activepieces, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-tradingagents