# Activepieces vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 25 269 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +550 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; tobab needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-tobab