# Activepieces vs Tiramisu

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | Tiramisu |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #40 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 25 267 ✓ | 149 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.11.8 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 47/100 for Tiramisu, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Tiramisu.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Tiramisu needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [Tiramisu](https://selfhost.directory/project/tiramisu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tiramisu.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-tiramisu