Activepiecesvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →supabase-automated-self-host details →