# Activepieces vs supa-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | supa-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [supa-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-supa-manager