Activepiecesvssupa-manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | supa-manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →supa-manager details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep supa-manager, compare it with