ActivepiecesvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +546 | +52 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+546 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Standard Notes details →