# Activepieces vs self-hosted-livesync-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | self-hosted-livesync-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 ✓ | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-self-hosted-livesync-server