Activepiecesvsself-hosted-livesync-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | self-hosted-livesync-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →self-hosted-livesync-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with