# Activepieces vs searcharr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | searcharr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #51 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 25 278 ✓ | 304 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +559 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.0 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 49/100 for searcharr, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for searcharr.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; searcharr needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+559 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [searcharr](https://selfhost.directory/project/searcharr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searcharr.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-searcharr