# Activepieces vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 35 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +1 687 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 687 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-rustfs