# Activepieces vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for Activepieces.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-rudderstack