Activepiecesvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 39 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for Activepieces.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →rudderstack details →