# Activepieces vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 25 273 ✓ | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +554 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+554 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-qm-music