ActivepiecesvsPulumi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Pulumi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 25 262 | 25 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +562 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 78/100 for Pulumi, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+562 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Pulumi details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Pulumi, compare it with