# Activepieces vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 ✓ | 9 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 ✓ | +183 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 75/100 for Pterodactyl, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-pterodactyl