# Activepieces vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 | 61 805 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 | +1 493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 81/100 for Activepieces, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 493 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)
- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-penpot