Activepiecesvspaymenter
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | paymenter | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 2 811 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +500 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 14 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 68/100 for paymenter, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for paymenter.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; paymenter needs more configuration.
Activepieces details →paymenter details →