# Activepieces vs OrcaQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | OrcaQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 ✓ | 225 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.14 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 81/100 against 49/100 for OrcaQ, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OrcaQ.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [OrcaQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-orca-q