# Activepieces vs octelium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Activepieces | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 25 273 ✓ | 4 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +554 ✓ | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Activepieces scores 80/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for octelium.

If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

Activepieces is growing faster right now (+554 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Activepieces](https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activepieces.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-octelium