ActivepiecesvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 25 262 | 17 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +562 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 16 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.0.7 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Nomad.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+562 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Nomad details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Nomad, compare it with