# activemq vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | activemq | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +320 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 64/100 for activemq, so it is the safer default.

activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [activemq](https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activemq-vs-nocodb