activemqvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| activemq | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 15 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 64/100 for activemq, so it is the safer default.
activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
activemq details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep activemq, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with