# activemq vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | activemq | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 2 734 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +48 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

activemq scores 64/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

metamcp is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [activemq](https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activemq-vs-metamcp