# activemq vs langflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | activemq | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 156 112 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +921 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 64/100 for activemq, so it is the safer default.

activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.

langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [activemq](https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/activemq.md)
- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/activemq-vs-langflow