# actions-runner-controller vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 613 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +96 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+96 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-zero-k